内容:文本/纯文本;charset = " utf - 8 " TY -的A1Łaszkiewicz, Edyta A1 -沃尔夫,Manuel A1 -安德森,Erik A1 - Kronenberg Jakub A1 -巴顿,大卫·n·A1 -•哈斯达格玛A1 - Langemeyer Johannes A1 -气压,弗朗西斯A1 - McPhearson,丁满TI -绿色植物在城市形态:城市绿地可达性差异的比较分析为各种城市结构在欧洲城市N2 -城市生态系统需要集成的理解和跨学科的方法。本文从城市形态的角度探讨了城市绿地可达性的差异。与其他遵循简化的UGS提供量化和/或忽略城市空间形态属性影响的比较分析相比，本研究提出了三个改进。首先，它使用UGS在城市每栋居民楼周围300米步行距离的服务区域中的份额作为UGS提供的衡量标准。其次，它包括UGS潜在的物理可访问性，这是由关键参与者(如所有者或管理者)所保证的，他们决定UGS是否对潜在用户开放。第三，将UGS可达性与异质城市结构联系起来。我们开发了一种混合方法分析，结合了UGS、住宅建筑空间分布和街道网络的多个数据源。我们在五个个案研究城市(巴塞罗那、哈雷、罗兹、奥斯陆和斯德哥尔摩)进行了分析。我们的研究结果表明，人-环境互动改变了空间的城市结构(如核心城市区域)的特征是服务区域的UGS有限。 Urban structures that are less transformed by human activity (especially suburbia) have the highest share of selected UGS in the service area. In addition, even if the share of UGS in the service area is high, many of them might have limited physical accessibility. In the broader sense, this highlights that social-ecological processes are linked to urban form and cannot be separated in an analysis. Therefore, social-ecological systems could be better understood through the lens of urban morphology. JO - Ecology and Society PB - The Resilience Alliance Y1 - 2022 P1 - 2022 VL - 27 IS - 3 C7 - 22 UR - //www.dpl-cld.com/vol27/iss3/art22/ DO - 10.5751/ES-13453-270322 KW - GIS KW - land use KW - landscape metrics KW - social-ecological systems KW - spatial analysis KW - urban green space management ER -